AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/046
*Corresponding Author: Kalyani singh, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Bihar, India.
Citation: Kalyani singh, Komal Gupta, Saksham Kr Singh. (2021) Retained Foreign Body (Gossypiboma) Following Abdominal Hysterectomy; Removed Per Vaginum-2 Case Reports. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 3(5); DOI: 10.31579/2693-4779/046
Copyright: © 2021 Kalyani singh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 May 2021 | Accepted: 29 May 2021 | Published: 02 June 2021
Keywords: gossypiboma; adenomyosis;endometriosis
Total abdominal hysterectomy is a quite common open surgical operation accounting for 54% of all benign diseases. Indications are uterine fibroids, adenomyosis/endometriosis, AUB, chronic pelvic pain, cancer of ovaries, uterus or cervix or cancer phobia. It is relatively an uncomplicated operation and easiest when least required.
Abdominal hysterectomy is the second most common operation among women, first being the cesarean section. Approximately 6,00,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in the United States of America. In India as a whole, 6% of women aged 30-49 years, had undergone a hysterectomy [1].
Every surgery has its own operative and post-operative risk, so the hysterectomy has. Risk increases if patient is obese, there is restricted mobility of uterus, moderate to severe adhesions or improper anesthesia. Intra-operative bleeding along with obesity and inadequate relaxation of abdominal muscles are the worst combination. In haste, a piece of gauze piece or surgical pads or sometimes any surgical foreign material may be left in the abdominal cavity and lost between the layers of intestine or in para colic gutters and may be forgotten. ‘Gossypiboma’ is the term used for the piece of cotton material left in the abdominal cavity after any surgical operation. ’Gossypium’ is the Latin word means ‘cotton’, and ‘Boma’ is Swahili means ‘a place of concealment’ [2]. Gossypiboma was 1st described by Wilson in 1984 [3].
Once left, they are mostly taken out by surgery, laparoscopy or laprotomy, to save the patient.
It is an uncommon complication .In fact, data are underestimated because of lack of reports considering its serious medico legal implications [4].
Here, we are presenting 2 cases of gauze pieces/ surgical towels (tetra), left in abdominal cavity following total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) which were removed per vaginum within 3 months of original operation. TAH has an advantage over other abdominal operations. Here pouch of douglas is opened during surgery which is most dependent and weakest part of the abdomen. Excessive pus like discharge takes place if something (Gossypiboma) is left in pouch of Douglas. A speculum examination may lead to early diagnosis and removal of the material per vaginum. If a lady complains of excessive vaginal discharge following TAH, persisting even after 6 weeks, a strong suspicion and investigation for Gossypiboma should be made. At this stage removal is considerably easy.
Case 1
A 35 years old women had TAH in June 2019. Her recovery was uncomplicated and was discharged on 8th day. One month later, she reported with some pain, feverish feel and pus like discharge per vaginum. Abdominal stitches were healthy. A course of antibiotic was given and she was advised to maintain hygiene. She reported again after 15days with some supra pubic lump and vaginal discharge. A speculum examination was made. A gauze like material was visible partly at vault suture line. It was held with a sponge holder and pulled gently. It was thought to be a forgotten gauze piece but a 4x4 inch, multi layered, gauze towel came out. Nothing was disclosed to Patient and attendant, 3 days IV antibiotics were given and patient recovered well. She has no complains since then.
TAH was done on 38 years old, multi gravida for big fibroid on 13th Sept 2020. On 7th Oct she reported with continuous spotting. Patient was assured that it’s a minor post-op complication. On 23rd Nov, she complained of white discharge for 2 months. Antibiotics were given. She came again on 30th Dec with similar complain and a speculum examination was made which showed gauze like material peeping at vault suture line. It was pulled gently with sponge holder and it was a small gauze piece. On 25thJan 2021, her vault had completely healed up with no discharge.
Gossypiboma is an uncommon and iatrogenic, dread ful condition due to its medical and medico legal complications. Its prevalence is difficult to judge due to under reporting of cases. It has been reported to occur in 100 to 5000 of all surgical operations and 1 in 1000-1500 for intra-abdominal operations [5]. It is ironically said that if you have never left a gauze piece in abdominal cavity, you haven’t done sufficient number of surgeries.
It may mimic tumor, cyst, adhesions, infection or malignancy.
Different types of materials are used by the surgeon as an adjunct to surgery like suture materials, prosthesis, implants, surgical mesh etc. They could be absorbable/ inert material and well tolerated, like surgical sutures, implants or mesh etc. Gauze are made of cotton fibers, non-absorbable materials and may produce foreign body reactions producing symptoms.
Two types of responses in the body are seen with Gossypibomas- exudative and aseptic fibrosis. Exudative Gossypiboma, however, usually occur early in post-operative period and may have secondary bacterial contamination which can result in fever, pain, nausea & vomiting, lump formation or various fistulas.
Aseptic fibrosis may remain asymptomatic for long time, may have adhesions, encapsulations, and may present as pain, lump, obstruction etc. If left for considerable time in the abdomen, the sponge can be surrounded by omentum and bowel, which attempt to encapsulate it. In an endeavor to expel the foreign body, bowel may engulf the sponge without any apparent opening in the intestinal wall. If such material can’t completely pass through the ileo- caecal valve, it may cause intestinal obstruction at this level. If it passes through this valve, it may be easily discharged through the anus [6]. A high degree of suspicion for Gossypiboma is needed if patient has prior history of some operation at the site of complications. Routine diagnostic modalities for finding a Gossypiboma are, ultra sonography, X-Ray, CT scan and MRI and lastly surgical exploration.
Diagnosis in our cases were quite simple. On per speculum examination, we were able to see the gauze peeping through the vault suture line. This was because body tries to expel out any foreign material by the easiest and nearest route. Here the vaginal vault, as it is opened up during hysterectomy and is the most dependent portion of the abdominal cavity. Usually pouch of Douglas is packed during TAH to keep intestines away.
Ultra sonography is the most widely used preliminary test to diagnose any intra-abdominal pathology. The typical ultrasound features of Gossypiboma has been divided in three types(i) an echogenic area with strong acoustic shadow due to retained gauze,(ii) a well-defined cystic mass containing distinct internal hyper-echoic, wavy, striped structures; and (iii) quite nonspecific patterns with a hyper echoic mass or complex mass [7].
X ray radiography could be diagnostic if a radio-opaque material is incorporated with the retained swab or surgical gauze. But it could be difficult in radiolucent swabs or long standing cases as surgical markers may become twisted or folded and may present an unusual picture making the diagnosis difficult.
Chrematistic features of CT scan include spongiform appearance with gas bubbles, low density mass with a thin enhancing capsule and calcification deposited along with the network architecture of a surgical sponge. Now a days, CT is the main modality for diagnosis (61%), followed by radiography (35%), and USG (34%) [8].
On MRI, Gossypiboma in the abdomen and pelvis appear as a well-defined mass that show a peripheral wall of low signal intensity on T1 and T enhanced MRI in T2W imaging. Contrast enhanced MRI is more informative. In that T1W images shows serrated contour on the inner border of peripheral wall and whorled stripes are seen in the central portion as low signal at T2W imaging.
In a study series of 14 cases of Gossypibomas by Alper Sozutek et al, 10(71.4%) cases were done by general surgeons while 4 (28.6%) were operated by gynaecologist [9].
Aruna Nigam reported a case of gossypiboma following laproscopic hysterectomy. Patient complained of continued vaginal discharge and speculum examination revealed a small pus discharging sinus at the vaginal vault. First it was treated conservatively .CT scan revealed a 3.5 cm rounded wall lesion in relation to recto sigmoid junction with peripheral enhancement and air loculi within. Sinus was dilated and a gauze piece taken out with artery forceps 1 year after the original operation. Patient recovered [10].
In a case control study of 54 cases and 235 matched control, Gibbs Et al mentioned 8 risk factors emergency operation, unexpected change in operation, more than 1 surgical team involved, change in nursing staff during procedure, high body mass index, increased volume of blood loss, female sex, and surgical counts stated by He considered 3 risk factors to be stastically significant- emergency surgery, unplanned change in the operation and increased body mass index.11 In the above list ,we would like to add one more risk factors-improper anesthesia and relaxation ,restricted mobility of the uterus and dense adhesions. Overconfidence also leads to mistakes. In my 1st case report, surgeon took out the uterus, left the abdominal closure for assistant and went for another surgery. Gyne operations are mostly done under spinal anesthesia and if relaxation is not adequate, protusion of bowel in operative field may displace some gauze piece or packing material in between layers of bowel loops.
Florian Oehme reported a sucked surgical sponge causing bowel obstruction following vaginal hysterectomy. Emergency laparotomy was done 22 months after original surgery and bowel loop resection saved the lady [12].
Nitin N Shah et al reported a case of gossypiboma following vaginal hysterectomy [13].Lady presented with H/o occasional fever following vaginal hysterectomy 4 months back. She had purulent vaginal discharge. A gauze piece was taken out laparoscopically.
Gossypiboma is a preventable condition. Surgeon and team needs to be alert while using any packing material. Still mishap takes place. So many preventable steps has been advised. Swab count at the beginning of operation and before closure of abdomen must be done. Swabs should be used abdominally when they are ‘mounted on a stick’ means by holding with some long instrument like sponge holder, artery or Ellis forceps. Sponges should be tagged with a radio-opaque marker. Newer techniques for tracing include electronic article surveillance system which uses tagged surgical sponge that can be detected electronically [14]. To effectively use surgical instruments, Kant Medical Centre NTTEC in Tokyo introduced automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) technologies in the theatre sterile supply unit. Bar codes applied to all sponges are detectable with bar code scanners [15].But these are expensive methods, simple tagging of gauze towel with long tails may prevent much complications.
Gossypiboma is an iatrogenic, serious medical error with its medical and medico legal complication which may lead to patient’s morbidity and mortality too. TAH has an advantage over other abdominal surgery that vaginal vault is opened here which is the weakest and most dependent portion of the abdominal cavity. Initially a Gossypiboma gives a warning signal in form of excessive vaginal discharge which may be associated with fever, lump, blood stained discharge and /or other constitutional symptoms. A simple speculum examination may diagnose the case and gentle traction of the gauze may cure the patient.
If diagnosed late, Gossypiboma may migrate to other site in an endeavor to be expelled by other routes, requiring laparotomy or laparoscopy.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
